Sarah A. Ferguson
Areas of Practice
- U.S. District Court, District of Nevada
- U.S. District Court, Southern And Eastern Districts of New York
- J.D., New York Law School, cum laude, June 2012
- B.A., Whitman College, cum laude, History with Honors, May 2006
- New York Law School Law Review, Editor in Chief
- John Marshall Harlan Scholar
Sarah Ferguson is an associate with the firm’s litigation department where her practice focuses on complex commercial litigation and natural resources law. Ms. Ferguson has represented clients in a variety of industries, including aerospace, mining, energy, financial services, and pharmaceutical companies in both state and federal courts. She has extensive experience handling all phases of litigation from court appearances to managing large case teams, drafting dispositive motions, and conducting depositions.
Ms. Ferguson is committed to serving the Reno community, and, to that end, has an active pro bono practice, including direct services and community outreach.
Ms. Ferguson is a Reno native, and before returning to Nevada she practiced as a litigator in New York City, focusing on white collar defense and commercial litigation matters. She also served as a law clerk for the Hon. Howard D. McKibben of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
- Representation of mining industry leader in a breach of warranty case involving steel pipes for transporting pastefill, resulting in favorable settlement
- Defense of Nevada energy firm in a breach of contract appeal before U.S. Civilian Board of Contract Appeals resulting in a favorable settlement
- Representation of mining industry leader in a breach of warranty case involving steel pipes for transporting pastefill
- Representation of mining company in action related to breach of contract for claim royalty payments, culminating in a favorable settlement
- Representation of multi-national energy company in shareholder derivative class action
- Representation of financial guaranty insurer in prosecuting breach of contract and fraudulent inducement case involving mortgage-backed securities
- Defense of law firm and attorney against malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty claims stemming from a multi-year litigation over a call option, culminating in settlement
- Defense of aircraft manufacturer in breach of contract and trade secrets action, culminating in settlement
- Representation of multiple employees of large financial institution in internal investigation into OSHA complaint and related whistleblower allegations
- Representation of multiple employees of large financial institution under investigation by DOJ related to foreign exchange practices
- Successful upgrade of refugee family’s immigration status
- Representation of children in dependency proceedings in family court
- Representation of over 90 former tenants in suit against landlord for property damage caused by a fire
- Advising an NYC not-for-profit on employment matters
- Represent incarcerated individual in habeas proceedings before the Ninth Circuit.
- Washoe Legal Services – Board Member
- Lilley Museum, UNR – Board Member
- Reno Contemporaries – Founding Member
- Reno Human Rights Commission – Former Commissioner
Awards and Recognition
- The Best Lawyers of America© 2021 – Commercial Litigation
First Department Adds Two New Factors to New York’s Standard Of Review for Non-Monetary Settlements of Shareholder Class Actions
On Feb. 2, 2017, the Appellate Division, First Department issued a unanimous decision in Gordon v. Verizon Communications, Inc., No. 653084/13, 2017 BL 31251 (1st Dep’t Feb. 2, 2017), that…
In the past, a foreign bank’s use of correspondent bank accounts in the United States to facilitate wire transfers has not necessarily given New York courts a sufficient basis for…
You have chosen to send an email to McDonald Carano. The sending or receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create an attorney-client relationship. If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers. If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you.
I have read this and want to send an email.