Bar Admissions
  • Nevada
Court Admissions
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Supreme Court
Education
  • J.D., Valedictorian, with Great Distinction, Order of the Coif, University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law, 1989
  • M.S., Exercise Sciences, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, 1983
  • B.S., Exercise Sciences, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, 1980
Bar Admissions
  • Nevada
Court Admissions
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Supreme Court
Education
  • J.D., Valedictorian, with Great Distinction, Order of the Coif, University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law, 1989
  • M.S., Exercise Sciences, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, 1983
  • B.S., Exercise Sciences, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, 1980

Professional Background

Pat Lundvall is a highly skilled litigator who serves as Chair of the Commercial & Complex Litigation Practice. In addition to ranking Pat in the highest Band 1 category, Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business also ranks the Commercial & Complex Litigation Practice in Band 1. Pat is the only woman attorney ranked Band 1 in Commercial Litigation in the state of Nevada and she is the only woman attorney who chairs a Band 1 ranked Commercial Litigation practice in Nevada.

Pat’s clients include local, state, national and international businesses of all sizes operating in nearly every sector of Nevada’s economy. She represents them as their primary outside counsel in every phase of complex commercial litigation. Pat also serves as Nevada counsel in complex multiparty and multidistrict litigation, and out-of-state law firms regularly select Pat to represent their clients when suit is necessary in Nevada.

Pat has successfully represented clients in judge and jury trials in state and federal courts, as well as on appeal to the Nevada Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court. She is particularly experienced in handling complex business disputes involving business entity disputes and dissolutions, healthcare, fraud including government fraud, unfair trade practices, unfair competition, RICO and antitrust violations, among others. Pat also handles matters involving employment law, defamation, deprivation of constitutional rights, and wrongful death.

In the Chambers USA ranking of the leading lawyers in Nevada Commercial Litigation, clients provided the following comments about Pat’s expertise to Chambers researchers. “Pat is highly respected in Nevada. She is an outstanding strategic thinker and is very creative in crafting winning strategies.” “She has an excellent in-court presence.” “Pat is a goddess; meticulous and absolutely brilliant.” “Pat is a zealous advocate and an excellent litigator.” “She provides a clear understanding of the legal process every step of the way. She is extremely knowledgeable and an expert in her field.” “Pat is one of the best trial lawyers I’ve ever seen, possessing perseverance, tenacity, good judgment and composure under intense pressure.” “Pat is our partner on serious litigation matters and has provided outstanding client service. She has our best interests in mind at all times.”

Pro Bono
Pat continues to dedicate time and expertise to pro bono work, including a recent case she successfully tried before Judge Joanna S. Kishner. The case was brought on behalf of a young female Navy recruiter who is also responsible for the care of her mother and young son. The recruiter purchased a home with a latent defect that was known to the seller but not disclosed at the time of sale. The judge awarded compensatory damages and then trebled them per the statute, and the statute also allowed for an award of fees. The case settled for the full amount of compensatory damages and costs. Pat accepted the case through the Office of Military Legal Assistance under the Attorney General’s Office, which is a pro bono service program that McDonald Carano helped create.

Publications

  • Author, The Rise and Fall of the Antitrust Exemption for the Business of Insurance, John Stauffer Memorial published by the University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law, June 1989
  • Chapter on Pretrial Conferences, Nevada Civil Practice Manual

Professional Certifications

  • Board Certified in Civil Trial Law and Civil Practice Advocacy by the National Board of Trial Advocacy (since 2001)
  • Board Certified as Civil Trial Advocacy Specialist by the State Bar of Nevada (first attorney certified in the State)

Awards and Recognition

  • Top Verdicts & Settlements of the West “Top 25 Verdicts 2021” – #1 largest in Nevada, #1 largest in Contracts in 13-state West region, and #9 largest in all areas of law in 13-state West region, ALM/American Lawyer Media’s VerdictSearch (Fremont Emergency Services (Mandavia), et al. vs. UnitedHealth Group, Inc. et al., Dec. 7, 2021)
  • Vegas Inc./Las Vegas Weekly “Women Inspiring Nevada” award (2022)
  • Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business – Band 1 Commercial Litigation (2011-2022)
  • Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated (since 2001)
  • The Best Lawyers in America – Commercial Litigation (2005-2023), Labor and Employment Litigation (2011-2023), Appellate (2023)
  • Super Lawyers Magazine “Mountain States Super Lawyer” – Business Litigation (2007-2022)
  • Super Lawyers Magazine “Top 50 Women” Mountain States Super Lawyers (2010-2022)
  • Super Lawyers Magazine “Top 100” Mountain States Super Lawyers (2022)
  • Vegas Magazine “Vegas Gives Honoree” (2019)
  • Nevada Business Magazine “Legal Elite” (2009, 2011, 2015, 2017)
  • Las Vegas Business Press – “Female Business Leaders”
  • “Distinguished Nevadan” Award presented by the Nevada System of Higher Education Board of Regents (2012)
  • “New Thinking About Thinking” Award from Keep Memory Alive/The Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health (2011)
  • Las Vegas Sun “Women to Watch” (2010)
  • Nevada Business Magazine “Women to Watch: Profiles of Nevada’s Business Leaders” (2003)

Professional Affiliations

  • Senior Fellow, Litigation Counsel of America
  • Co-Founder and Advisory Board member, Complex Commercial Litigation Institute
  • Nevada Fellow, American Bar Foundation
  • Former Commissioner and Past Chair, Nevada State Athletic Commission (2007-2016)
  • Member, Public Private Partnership Advisory Panel to the Nevada Department of Transportation (2007)

Community Engagement

  • Board Member, Secretary, Friends of the Nevada Mansion
  • Board Member, Vice President, Nevada Military Support Alliance

Representative Engagements

Pat served as lead Nevada trial counsel in a case that upended the national out-of-network healthcare reimbursement system with a jury verdict that awarded $60 million in punitive damages and $2.65 million in compensatory damages to three Nevada-based emergency room provider practice groups affiliated with Tennessee-based TeamHealth. The three groups filed suit in 2019 against UnitedHealthcare for underpaying out-of-network emergency room healthcare providers. After five days of jury selection, Pat presented opening statement before Eighth District Court Judge Nancy Allf in Las Vegas. Pat’s team at McDonald Carano conceived and directed all discovery; drafted, argued and won all of their 55 substantive pretrial motions; successfully convinced the court to sanction UnitedHealthcare with an adverse inference in the form of a jury instruction that was critical in closing arguments; and drafted and successfully opposed UnitedHealthcare’s two petitions for writ review and two motions to stay before the Nevada Supreme Court that UnitedHealthcare had attempted to use to prevent the case from being tried promptly. Pat and her team also drafted the briefs and Pat argued a critical case before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that established new precedent on ERISA preemption (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974). Without a victory in that case, all cases across the nation brought by TeamHealth against UnitedHealthcare and other insurance carriers were at risk of being dismissed. Pat’s oral argument on 02/04/2021 before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is available here.

Pat led oral argument, representing her clients (Petitioners Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) as well as 25+ attorneys and their clients. The successful outcome involved the original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order denying in part a motion to dismiss in a tort action. The Supreme Court held that a city’s power to maintain a lawsuit must be derived from an express grant of power or fall within a “matter of local concern” as defined in applicable statutory language. Though the district court found that the action involved a “matter of local concern,” it used its own definition of that term and misapplied the statutory definition. Thus, the Supreme Court remanded, directing the district court to reconsider the motion to dismiss and strictly apply the definition of a “matter of local concern” (as set forth in NRS 268.003) to the City’s claims. Pat’s oral argument on 01/05/2021 before the Supreme Court of Nevada is available here.

  • California Franchise Tax Board v. Gilbert P. Hyatt

After a complete defense victory, on April 6, 2022, the Clark County District Court awarded McDonald Carano’s client $2,262,815.56 in recoverable costs, representing a conclusion to more than 24 years of litigation in a case that also overturned U.S. Supreme Court precedent dating back to 1979. Pat led a litigation and appellate team representing the California Franchise Tax Board since 1998 in a matter adverse to inventor Gilbert P. Hyatt which went before the U.S. Supreme Court three times and the Nevada Supreme Court numerous times. The case was closely watched throughout the country as it evolved from a simple state income tax dispute to a broader constitutional concern about state sovereignty and whether a private party may sue a non-consenting state in another state’s courts. Hyatt, who had moved to Nevada from California, complained the FTB had committed torts while auditing him. In the first case, he won hundreds of millions of dollars in Nevada state courts, but the FTB appealed. In 2016, the second time the parties appeared at the Supreme Court, Hyatt’s award was greatly reduced, but on the constitutional matter of whether Hall should be overturned, the court split 4-4 in the wake of Justice Antonin Scalia’s death, spurring the FTB to come back in another attempt to overturn Nevada v. Hall. In a 5-4 decision from Justice Clarence Thomas, the justices overturned their 1979 precedent in Nevada v. Hall that had allowed such suits and handed a victory to the FTB. For California and more than 40 states that joined as amici, the decision is significant as a resident of one state will no longer be able to sue another state except in its own courts. The May 2019 SCOTUS ruling is available here. Pat’s May 2017 argument before the Nevada Supreme Court is available here. Law360 reported on the May 2019 SCOTUS ruling in an article titled “States Can’t Be Sued In Other States’ Courts, Justices Say.

  • Pardee Homes of Nevada v. Wolfram et. al., Before the Southern Nevada Panel, Justice Hardesty Presiding 1/23/19 NSC Oral Argument
  • John B. Quinn, Michael T. Zeller, Michael l. Fazio, Ian S. Shelton, Elaine P. Wynn v.  Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada, in and for County of Clark; and The Honorable Elizabeth Gonzalez, District Judge, Nevada Supreme Court Case No. 74519 12/4/17 NSC Oral Argument
  • Governor James Gibbons in Chrissy Mazzeo v. James Gibbons et. al., a case alleging assault and deprivation of constitutional rights
  • Amerco, the parent company of U-Haul International, in Paul Shoen v. Amerco et.al., a shareholder derivative case alleging insider dealing
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb in State of Nevada v. Bristol-Myers Squibb et. al., a case alleging price fixing
  • D.R. Horton, Inc., in multiple homeowner cases alleging mortgage fraud
  • Pardee Homes of Nevada v. A.D. Seeno Construction, a case concerning development of Coyote Springs
  • Five Mile Capital v. Jeff and Jackie Soffer in a dispute over development to Town Square Lifestyle Center
  • Landmark Homes and Development in Sierra Gateway Ventures v. Landmark, et. al., a case alleging breach of contract and bad faith
  • Pardee Homes of Nevada and Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company, in J.P. Morgan v. Pardee et. al., a case alleging breach of contract
  • Southwest Gas Corporation in Richard de los Reyes v. Southwest Gas Corporation, a case alleging employment discrimination
  • George Stephanopoulos and Little Brown Company in Gennifer Flowers v. James Carville et. al., a case alleging defamation
  • Southern Wine and Spirits of America, Inc., in SWS v. Bacardi-Martini USA, a case alleging unfair trade practices

12/17/18 Pat Lundvall Oral Argument in Winecup, Inc. v. Gordon Ranch LP

Attorney News

Nevada’s Largest Team of Business Litigation Super Lawyers

McDonald Carano congratulates Jim Bradshaw, Pat Lundvall, George Ogilvie, Jeff Silvestri and Amanda Yen for being recognized as Business Litigation Super Lawyers in the 2022 edition of Mountain States Super…

Pat Lundvall Receives 12th Annual Recognition in Top 50 Women Super Lawyers List

McDonald Carano congratulates Pat Lundvall, Chair of our Commercial & Complex Litigation Practice, on her 12th consecutive annual recognition in the “Top 50 Women Super Lawyers” list for the Mountain…

Our Super Lawyers 2022 Highlights: Ten Attorneys and Four Practice Groups

McDonald Carano proudly announces that 10 attorneys in our Reno and Las Vegas offices received recognition in four areas of law in the Mountain States Super Lawyers list for 2022….

You have chosen to send an email to McDonald Carano. The sending or receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create an attorney-client relationship. If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers. If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you.

I have read this and want to send an email.