States Need Realistic Expectations For Sports Betting
Law360, May 24, 2018
On May 14, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court entered its decision in the Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association case removing the federal ban on sports betting in the U.S. The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 grandfathered sports betting in only four states, Nevada, Oregon, Delaware and Montana. New Jersey’s myriad challenges to PASPA, and the resultant Supreme Court ruling of May 14, struck PASPA down. States are now free to legalize and regulate sports betting.
In the run-up to the court’s decision, many state officials across the country viewed legalized sports betting as the answer to their budgetary problems. The unofficial estimate of the total amount wagered in sports betting in the U.S. was staggering, with the sum of over $150 billion bandied about. Hence, the rush in various states that offer casino gambling to enact statutes and regulations in order to offer sports betting in their casinos.
In retrospect, as with most things in life, the decision in Murphy was entirely predictable. The court’s conservative majority continued its trend of deferring matters to the states. Whether the court will follow this precedent with more politically charged issues such as legalized marijuana or right-to-die, remains to be seen.
In its attempt to carve out exceptions to existing sports betting jurisdictions, Congress in PASPA dictated that state legislatures were prohibited from authorizing sports gambling. The court said that clearly Congress had the constitutional authority to ban sports betting in the U.S. outright, but the Constitution prohibits Congress from issuing orders directly to the states, or from commandeering the state legislative process. The Constitution grants Congress the “power to regulate individuals and not states,” and PASPA violated that dictate.
To read entire article click here.
About McDonald Carano
McDonald Carano has been shaping Nevada’s legal, business, and policy landscape since our founding in 1949. With more than 60 lawyers and government affairs professionals working from offices in Las Vegas, Reno and Carson City, we are Nevada’s law firm for business. Our local, national and global clients include Fortune 500 corporations, fast-growth and mid-market companies, entrepreneurs and startups, non-profit organizations, government entities, and high-net-worth individuals. Our attorneys deliver cross-discipline, one-stop, commercial law and government affairs counsel. Our dedication to clients, innovative thinking and practical solutions based in sound business and legal judgments are at the heart of our practice. For more information, please visit mcdonaldcarano.com or send an email to email@example.com.
You have chosen to send an email to McDonald Carano. The sending or receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create an attorney-client relationship. If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers. If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you.
I have read this and want to send an email.