State Groundwater Management and Federal Reserved Rights: What’s Next?
ABA Water Resources Committee Newsletter, March 1, 2018
By Debbie Leonard and Micheline Fairbank
Over 100 years ago in the case of Winters v. United States, 207 U.S. 564 (1908), the Supreme Court first articulated the concept of federal reserved water rights. Establishing what is now known as the Winters doctrine, the Supreme Court held that when setting aside Indian reservations, the United States impliedly reserved sufficient water to fulfill the purposes of such reservations. Subsequently, the Court expressly acknowledged that the reserved rights doctrine includes any reservation of federal land. See Cappaert v. United States, 426 U.S. 128 (1976). Federal reserved rights have two unique attributes that differentiate them from water rights recognized under state law: they vest on the date the reservation was created, and they cannot be lost through non-use.
To read entire article click here.
About McDonald Carano
McDonald Carano has helped to shape the Nevada business and legal landscape for 70 years. With more than 60 lawyers and government affairs professionals in our offices in Las Vegas and Reno, we are Nevada's law firm for business. We proudly represent Fortune 500 companies, financial and governmental institutions, fast-growth and mid-market companies, entrepreneurs, start-up ventures, non-profit organizations and individuals. Our attorneys deliver cross-discipline, one-stop, commercial law and government affairs counsel. Our dedication to clients, innovative thinking and practical solutions based in sound business and legal judgments are at the heart of our practice. For more information, visit mcdonaldcarano.com, call 775.788.2000 (Reno office), or 702.873.4100 (Las Vegas office) or reach us by email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
You have chosen to send an email to McDonald Carano. The sending or receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create an attorney-client relationship. If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers. If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you.
I have read this and want to send an email.