Judge Dismisses Steve Wynn Motion to End Shareholder Agreement
Las Vegas Review Journal, March 2, 2018
By Todd Prince
A Nevada court judge denied Steve Wynn’s motion Friday to terminate an eight-year-old shareholder agreement with his ex-wife Elaine that would have allowed both of them to sell their shares in Wynn Resorts.
The judge’s rejection could raise complications for Wynn and Wynn Resorts if gaming regulators in the meantime find the casino developer guilty of sexual harassment and deem him “unsuitable” for a license.
Massachusetts and Nevada gaming regulators are investigating the sexual harassment accusations. Wynn denies the claims. Wynn Resorts owns two casinos in Nevada and Macau and is scheduled to open one in Massachusetts next year.
The businessman could be forced by Massachusetts regulators to cut his stake below 5 percent. Wynn owns 11.8 percent, or $2 billion, of Wynn Resorts stock. Massachusetts gaming regulators declined to comment.
To read entire article click here.
About McDonald Carano
In 2024, McDonald Carano celebrates 75 years of serving Nevada’s legal, business, government, and civic communities. More than 60 lawyers and government relations professionals serve state, national, and international clients from our offices in Reno, Las Vegas, and Carson City. McDonald Carano provides legal services and government affairs and advocacy counsel to startups, corporations, trade associations, nonprofits, public entities, high-net-worth individuals, investors, and public-private partnerships throughout Nevada. We are proud to be your Nevada law firm since 1949.
You have chosen to send an email to McDonald Carano. The sending or receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create an attorney-client relationship. If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers. If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you.
I have read this and want to send an email.