February 1, 2020, The Writ, “Appellate Briefs”
In an article reviewing empirical research on judicial decisions, the authors addressed whether “aversion to reversal can produce undesirable, strategic effects on judicial decisions.” Rachlinski, Jeffrey J. and Wistrich, Andrew J., Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges, 13 Annual Review of Law and Social Science (2017). Noting the low rates of appellate reversal throughout the federal courts (“approximately 15% of appealed cases are reversed”), the article’s literature review identified studies that “support[ed] the conclusion that avoiding reversal matters to judges.” Id. at 10. Such reversal aversion could be caused by “embarrass[ment] by reversal or irritat[ion] by the extra work resulting from a remand.” Id. at 10. One recent reversal by the Nevada Supreme Court should not cause the trial judge any embarrassment though, as the Court itself took responsibility for the error leading to reversal. Reif by & through Reif v. Aries Consultants, Inc., 135 Nev. Adv. Op. 51, 449 P.3d 1253 (Oct. 10, 2019). To read the entire article click here.
About McDonald Carano
McDonald Carano has been shaping Nevada’s legal, business, and policy landscape since our founding in 1949. With more than 60 lawyers and government affairs professionals working from offices in Las Vegas, Reno and Carson City, we are Nevada’s law firm for business. Our local, national and global clients include Fortune 500 corporations, fast-growth and mid-market companies, entrepreneurs and startups, non-profit organizations, government entities, and high-net-worth individuals. Our attorneys deliver cross-discipline, one-stop, commercial law and government affairs counsel. Our dedication to clients, innovative thinking and practical solutions based in sound business and legal judgments are at the heart of our practice. For more information, please visit mcdonaldcarano.com or send an email to email@example.com.
You have chosen to send an email to McDonald Carano. The sending or receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create an attorney-client relationship. If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers. If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you.
I have read this and want to send an email.