Entity Wagering May Quickly Become a Thing of the Past in Nevada
OSGA.com, March 1, 2018
by Glenn Greene
Predicting the end of this Nevada legislation was the year’s Best Bet
Only a year ago I wrote a two-part report on why I confidently knew the colossally misguided idea of “entity wagering” was doomed to fail. The past week’s headlines have helped confirm my easy suspicions of this plan when one of the more known company’s attempting this venture closed their books. Sadly, they took some delusional people and their money with them for the ride.
To refresh our memory, here are the basics that were laid out to attract “investors” in this get-rich slow scheme, headquartered and only taking place in Nevada:
Entity Wagering 101 Update
Entity wagering can most simply be described as a sports betting mutual fund. Investors (bettors) bought into the fund with the entity manager subsequently investing money in preferred sports bets instead of traditional businesses or companies as in a mutual fund.
To read entire article click here.
About McDonald Carano
McDonald Carano has been shaping Nevada’s legal, business, and policy landscape since our founding in 1949. With more than 60 lawyers and government affairs professionals working from offices in Las Vegas, Reno and Carson City, we are Nevada’s law firm for business. Our local, national and global clients include Fortune 500 corporations, fast-growth and mid-market companies, entrepreneurs and startups, non-profit organizations, government entities, and high-net-worth individuals. Our attorneys deliver cross-discipline, one-stop, commercial law and government affairs counsel. Our dedication to clients, innovative thinking and practical solutions based in sound business and legal judgments are at the heart of our practice. For more information, please visit mcdonaldcarano.com or send an email to email@example.com.
You have chosen to send an email to McDonald Carano. The sending or receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create an attorney-client relationship. If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers. If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you.
I have read this and want to send an email.