ADA Prohibits Retaliation Against Workers Who Telecommute As A Reasonable Accommodation
July 17, 2020, Society of Human Resources Management (SHRM) Online News, by Allen Smith, J.D.
Workers who are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19 because of an underlying impairment may be entitled to telecommute as an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). But they may also be scared of being retaliated against for telecommuting.
Make sure managers know that the ADA prohibits retaliation, particularly given how common retaliation claims have become and how difficult they are for employers to defend against.
“Such claims are on the rise,” said Kristen Gallagher, an attorney with McDonald Carano in Las Vegas. According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the number of charges alleging retaliation has more than doubled in the last 20 years. In 1997, across all equal employment opportunity (EEO) statutes, claimants alleged retaliation in 22.6 percent of filed charges. That percentage has increased almost every subsequent year, Gallagher noted. In 2019, the percentage climbed to 53.8 percent.
About McDonald Carano
McDonald Carano has been shaping Nevada’s legal, business, and policy landscape since our founding in 1949. With more than 60 lawyers and government affairs professionals working from offices in Las Vegas, Reno and Carson City, we are Nevada’s law firm for business. Our local, national and global clients include Fortune 500 corporations, fast-growth and mid-market companies, entrepreneurs and startups, non-profit organizations, government entities, and high-net-worth individuals. Our attorneys deliver cross-discipline, one-stop, commercial law and government affairs counsel. Our dedication to clients, innovative thinking and practical solutions based in sound business and legal judgments are at the heart of our practice. For more information, please visit mcdonaldcarano.com or send an email to email@example.com.
You have chosen to send an email to McDonald Carano. The sending or receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create an attorney-client relationship. If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers. If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you.
I have read this and want to send an email.